Live search
TopFind is fetching the latest matches for your search.
We reviewed 10000 live results for working group on research evaluation and narrowed them down to the 3 options that look most worth comparing first.
The strongest themes across this short list are Professional Association and Evaluation Standards.
Source: DeGEval (Gesellschaft für Evaluation)
Description
A dedicated group that focuses on the methodologies and standards of 'forschungsevaluation'. They provide a platform for developing evaluation criteria specifically for the scientific community and research institutions in the DACH region.
Best for
European research evaluators, Evaluation methodology experts, Research standards development and Professional networking
Rating
Source: DeGEval – Gesellschaft für Evaluation e.V.
Description
A specialized working group within DeGEval that focuses on developing standards for educational evaluation. It provides a platform for cross-border educational analyses and the exchange of best practices in evaluating educational institutions and systems.
Best for
Evaluation specialists, Academic researchers, Educational quality auditors and Standardization experts
Rating
Source: Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR)
Description
Formal assessment services that utilize scientometric data to evaluate mission-oriented research impact. This process includes tracking publications, citations, and other performance metrics to ensure research alignment with Singapore's national science and technology goals.
Best for
Policy makers, Government agencies, Impact assessment and Public sector research
Rating
| Compare | Working Group on Research Evaluation | AK Bildung (Working Group Education) | Research Evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source | DeGEval (Gesellschaft für Evaluation) | DeGEval – Gesellschaft für Evaluation e.V. | Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR) |
| Description | A dedicated group that focuses on the methodologies and standards of 'forschungsevaluation'. They provide a platform for developing evaluation criteria specifically for the scientific community and research institutions in the DACH region. | A specialized working group within DeGEval that focuses on developing standards for educational evaluation. It provides a platform for cross-border educational analyses and the exchange of best practices in evaluating educational institutions and systems. | Formal assessment services that utilize scientometric data to evaluate mission-oriented research impact. This process includes tracking publications, citations, and other performance metrics to ensure research alignment with Singapore's national science and technology goals. |
| Best for | European research evaluators, Evaluation methodology experts, Research standards development and Professional networking | Evaluation specialists, Academic researchers, Educational quality auditors and Standardization experts | Policy makers, Government agencies, Impact assessment and Public sector research |
| Action | |||
| Rating |
If you want the most balanced option to start with, I recommend:
"Working Group on Research Evaluation from DeGEval (Gesellschaft für Evaluation)."
I picked this because This is the primary authority for establishing evaluation standards and professional networking within the specific context of German research evaluation (forschungsevaluation).