Live search
TopFind is fetching the latest matches for your search.
We reviewed 288 live results for quadrennial evaluation and narrowed them down to the 3 options that look most worth comparing first.
The strongest themes across this short list are Research Evaluation and Academic Accreditation.
Source: CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior)
Description
A comprehensive evaluation conducted every four years for all graduate programs in Brazil, assigning grades that determine their accreditation and level of federal funding.
Best for
University administrators, Graduate programs, Academic accreditation and Educational quality assessment
Rating
Source: FAPESP (São Paulo Research Foundation)
Description
Expert evaluation of scientific research projects and institutional performance to determine funding eligibility and project viability within the State of São Paulo.
Best for
State Level research, Funding applications, Institutional benchmarking and Peer review services
Rating
Source: SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online)
Description
Provides detailed bibliometric data and sets evaluation standards for journals to improve the quality and visibility of scientific publishing in Brazil.
Best for
Open science metrics, Scientific journal evaluation, Bibliometric reporting and Academic publishing standards
Rating
| Compare | Quadrennial Evaluation | Research Project Evaluation | Bibliometric Indicators and Journal Evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source | CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) | FAPESP (São Paulo Research Foundation) | SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online) |
| Description | A comprehensive evaluation conducted every four years for all graduate programs in Brazil, assigning grades that determine their accreditation and level of federal funding. | Expert evaluation of scientific research projects and institutional performance to determine funding eligibility and project viability within the State of São Paulo. | Provides detailed bibliometric data and sets evaluation standards for journals to improve the quality and visibility of scientific publishing in Brazil. |
| Best for | University administrators, Graduate programs, Academic accreditation and Educational quality assessment | State Level research, Funding applications, Institutional benchmarking and Peer review services | Open science metrics, Scientific journal evaluation, Bibliometric reporting and Academic publishing standards |
| Action | |||
| Rating |
If you want the most balanced option to start with, I recommend:
"Quadrennial Evaluation from CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior)."
I picked this because This is the primary formal evaluation system for postgraduate research quality in Brazil, essential for academic institutions seeking accreditation.